top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 02.06.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Jun 2, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Interpretation of provision of SEZ Act, 2005 cannot be in direct violation of provisions of CEA, 1944 - Duty is payable only by manufacturer: HC


ST - 12/2005-ST - Rebate - Filing of declaration is a procedural requirement and the delay, if any, in filing the same cannot be used for denying the substantive benefit: CESTAT


Cus - Smuggling of Red Sanders wood - appellant charged with such offence voluntarily gave statements accepting role played as well as attempt to prevent investigation into such issue - hence, depositors cannot later claim that statements were not taken voluntarily: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page