top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 04.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 4, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Clandestine removal - Such charges are not sustainable if based solely on statements taken from a third party & without permitting cross examination of depositor: CESTAT CX - Appellant can utilize Cenvat Credit of Basic Excise Duty for payment of NCCD: CESTAT ST - Although the owner of equipment had insured goods, effective control was with appellant and, therefore, issue is covered by definition of 'deemed sale' - service tax under the category of SOTG is not leviable on transaction: CESTAT Cus - Tribunal needs to give deference to decisions of its co-ordinate benches - matter remanded: HC

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page