top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 05.06.202

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Jun 5, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Since refund has arisen after Tribunal has passed remand order dated 17.10.2011, same is to be considered as relevant date for refund u/s 11B of CEA, 1944: CESTAT


ST - Benefit of VCES 2013 scheme was denied solely due to clerical errors in Form VCES-1 - The assessee already declared the tax dues & cannot be asked to do so again as it would violate provisions of FA 1994 & Article 265 of the Constitution: CESTAT


Cus - SCN issued to Customs Broker u/s 124 of Customs Act is not superior to any other communication, such as offence report - proceedings initiated under CBLR are unsustainable where offence report issued was not acted upon within prescribed timelines: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page