top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 08.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 9, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Interest - wordings used u/s 11AB clarify that liability to pay interest is linked to delayed payment of duty as determined u/s 11A of CEA 1944: CESTAT


- Rule 3(7) of CCR comes into operation only if benefit has been availed under Sr. no. 2 of 23/2003-CX - No authority produced where it is held that Rule applies to all clearances under said notification: CESTAT ST - Transportation of rice exempted by 25/2012-ST - since levy never applied, time limit u/s 11B of CEA, 1944 for refund of tax paid does not apply: CESTAT


- Activity of providing modems along with Online Information and Database Access Service, is deemed sale as per Article 366(29A) & is exclusive from service: CESTAT Cus - Inadvertent error of not ticking YES on online portal when availing MEIS benefit, per se is insufficient reason to reject request to amend shipping bills: HC


- Since Televisions are not notified u/s 123 of the Customs Act, burden is on Revenue to prove that these are smuggled: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page