top of page

CENEX UPDATE – 08.08.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Aug 8, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Amendment in rule 4(7) of CCR has got only prospective effect - for goods and invoices received prior to 1st September, 2014/11th July 2014, Cenvat Credit can be taken, being a vested right: CESTAT

ST - Benefit of Exemption under 1/2006-ST is admissible as it provides that Notification shall not apply only if the Credit has been used for providing 'such taxable service': CESTAT

Cus - Penalty imposed u/s 112(b)(i) for possession of seized Gold is not sustainable if based on assumptions & presumptions & where the person being penalized is unaware of the contraband nature of such Gold: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page