top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 09.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 10, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Once court has turned down prayer for grant of interest, even if reasoning for declining such relief may be fallacious, same would not fall within scope of a review application: HC CX - Principles of unjust enrichment would not be applicable to refund filed consequent to finalisation of provisional assessment initiated in year 1995, in 2008: CESTAT ST - Appellant had constructed independent buildings having one residential unit only - Thus, even if appellant had constructed more than 12 independent buildings, nature of activity would not be 'construction of complex' service - tax demand fails: CESTAT Cus - From definition of import, it is clear that goods are deemed to enter territorial waters of India at stage of completion of import & not on date of filing BoE - if importer possesses license on or before date of import, confication of goods is unwarranted: CESTAT Cus - Order has been passed without any jurisdiction since for assuming jurisdiction to pass an adjudication order, service of SCN is must - no effective service of SCN, hence appeal allowed: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page