top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 10.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 11, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - There is no bar in law to restrict Cenvat Credit of the CVD paid on the basis of provisionally assessed bills of entry: CESTAT CX - Activity does not amount to manufacture - As the appellant has paid duty upon removal of goods, same is to be treated as reversal of credit availed - demand unsustainable: CESTAT ST - Even when an assessee has suppressed facts, extended period of limitation can be invoked only when 'suppression' is shown to be wilful with intent to evade payment of tax: CESTAT Cus - Imported goods were re-exported due to cancellation of job work order - duty demanded for contravening conditions of Notfn No 32/97-Cus is not tenable as goods were not available in India at time of issuing SCN: CESTAT Cus - Cost Recovery Charges - Even if Regulation of HCCAR, 2009 is applicable, the same could be operative only if separate officer is posted to supervise the work at appellant's Jetty: CESTA

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page