top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 12.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 13, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - There is no evidence produced by Revenue indicating clandestine clearance of goods except the difference in figures shown in excise records and that in balance sheet - demand cannot be based upon assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT ST - Appellants are co-owners of property rented to ICICI Bank - Clubbing of rent received by all four individual co-owners of property was not legally sustainable - individual exemption available: CESTAT Cus - Import of Urea - Since amount of Rs. 17/- per MT has neither been paid by Appellant to GOI nor Appellant paid this amount to a third party, same cannot be added to transaction value u/r 10(1)(e) of 2007 Rules: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page