top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 13.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 13, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Circular dated 14.01.2011 clearly mandates that no provision exists in CCR 2004 which obligates receipient of goods to ascertain if duty was payable on subject goods by manufactuer & then avail CENVAT credit: CESTAT ST - Subsidy is paid by Tata Tele Services to compensate for loss incurred by Appellant on sale of mobile handsets at a lower price and this cannot be said to have any relation to service of promotion or marketing - no tax under BAS: CESTAT Cus - Cocoa Powder cannot be imported against items Flour/Atta/Maida - Penalty cannot be imposed & goods cannot be confiscated where the Revenue was aware of imports & if importer does nothing else to attract such action: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page