top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 14.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 14, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Electrical energy cannot be considered as 'Nil' rated goods or exempted goods, hence rule 6(3) of CCR is inapplicable: CESTAT ST - 40/2012-ST - Mere technical discrepancy in the invoices cannot be the ground for denying substantive benefit of refund available to SEZ unit: CESTAT ST - SOTG service - It is settled law that scope of levy is limited to service component of transaction - addition of goods/material having no bearing on cost of service is exercise in superfluity: CESTAT Cus - gap period - Levy of anti-dumping duty during the interregnum between the expiry of a provisional duty notification and the imposition of a final anti-dumping duty, is not valid: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page