top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 15.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 15, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Provisional assessment is to be resorted to where duty demand is not quantified at time of clerance of goods - hence rejection of request for provisional assessment is unsustainable: CESTAT CX - Wrong reversal of amount in terms of rule 6(3A) of CCR in the CENVAT credit account would not amount to payment of duty to Government - s.11B not attracted: CESTAT ST - Technical know-how cannot be treated as IPR under the current legal framework - Demand raised under IPR service merits being set aside: CESTAT Cus - An order dropping proceedings, if held to be non-operable pending disposal of appeal, would merely restore allegations in the SCN - Application seeking stay rejected: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page