top of page

CENEX UPDATE – 17.10.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Nov 7, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Only for the reason that M/s Vedanta paid duty amount much prior to issuance of SCN and without contesting went for settlement of their case, no adverse inference can be drawn so as to deny CENVAT credit availed by their consignee on supplementary invoices: CESTAT

ST - Mere reference to a paragraph in the SCN does not constitute a proper adjudication that devolves upon the original authority: CESTAT

Cus - Considerable discretion is vested on Licensing Authority with regard to grant or rejection of a licence under Ammonium Nitrate Rules - order refusing to grant a P5 licence needs no interference: HC

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page