top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 18.03.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Mar 31, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - There is no allegation that Cenvatted inputs were not received in the factory or that they were removed without payment of duty - contention of assessee that the inputs were used as packing material is acceptable: CESTAT

ST - Rejecting claim for Cenvat credit based solely on Range Officer's report is unsustainable, where copy of such report is not provided to assessee: CESTAT

ST - Parliament omitted Chapter V of FA, 1994 by amending same and no part of FA, 1994 was repealed by CGST Act: HC

ST - Rule 5A Audit - Argument that word 'Rules' is not mentioned in s.174(2) of CGST Act and, therefore, STR, 1994 were not saved is completely meritless: HC

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page