top of page

CENEX UPDATE – 19.07.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Jul 21, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Law does not dictate that an assessee can avail only 50% CENVAT credit in one given year or that remaining 50% credit can be availed in following year: CESTAT

ST - Appellant is a PSU and the amount demanded as tax is admissible as CENVAT credit - although penalties are imposable u/ss 76, 77 & 78, they are waived by application of s.80: CESTAT

Cus - Adopting a methodology of first-come-first-serve has inherent flaws and anybody having access to power corridor at some level is likely to secure unfair advantage at the cost of other applicants who may not have similar access: HC

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page