top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 2.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Mere deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal: CESTAT ST - To read down any distinction, other than that as enacted, would be a foray into impermissible and unknown territory - breach of jurisdiction by the adjudicating authority does not find favour with the Bench: CESTAT Cus - Demand raised on EoU in respect of waste material in its warehouse - matter remanded where Revenue did not examine merits of appellant's claims that SION norms do not apply onto EoUs: HC GST - Assessee was already dead as on date of assessment order and, therefore, assessment order is a nullity in eye of law: High Court

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page