top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 21.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 21, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - CENVAT credit cannot be denied on grounds that duty was paid for input service by Head Office, where claimant unit & its HO have common existence, as is evident from centralised registration certificate: CESTAT


ST - CENVAT - Refund - Harmonious construction of Export of Service Rules & CEA 1944 leads to inference that in case of export of service, relevant date is date of realisation of foreign exchange: CESTAT


Cus - Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) for importing batteries not conforming to BIS standard, merits being quashed, if non-procurement of certificates is temporary lapse later made good upon production of such certificate: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page