top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 22.05.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • May 22, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - As per Notfn No 24/2012-CE(NT), Cenvat credit taken or utilized of the duty, tax or cess paid on input goods or services or capital goods used in making the final product, need not be reversed, notwithstanding that cutting, slitting or printing aluminum foils is not tantamount to manufacture: CESTAT


ST - A subsequent entry having been enacted covering the activity without any change of the existing entry, the same has to be interpreted as if the earlier existing entry did not cover the subsequently created entry: CESTAT


Cus - Petitioner cannot be allowed to re-agitate its eligibility under DFCE Scheme in guise of fresh/revised application after judgment of apex Court and subsequent dismissal of its Review Petition - Cost of Rs.1 lakh to be deposited in PM CARES fund: HC

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page