top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 24.4.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked where assessee regularly filed ER-1 returns & if no suppression of facts is attributed to assessee as entire facts were known to Revenue: CESTAT ST - Assessee utilised CENVAT credit in advance of the date when it was not entitled to avail the same - matter remanded to calculate interest for differential period: CESTAT ST - Supply of Tangible Goods Service involves transfer of right of possession & effective control on such goods - Leasing of digital cinema equipment not taxable under SOTG: CESTAT Cus - Section 123 (2) of Customs Act requires a person in possession of gold bars having foreign markings, to only prima facie establish proof of licit acquisition & is not require to prove source: CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page