top of page

CENEX UPDATE – 28.10.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Nov 7, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - As the order was passed by the authorities below before issuance of s.11C notification, matter is remanded to determine applicability of the exemption notification: CESTAT

ST - CENVAT - Since the o-in-o confirming the demand for subsequent period was set aside by Commissioner(A), which order has been accepted by department, present appeal covering demand for earlier period is allowed: CESTAT

Cus - Automatic Patek Philippe wrist watch released in terms of o-in-a and order of Bombay High Court - since disputed goods are no longer available with department, application for stay of operation of o-in-a is dismissed: CESTAT

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page