top of page

CENEX UPDATE - 29.04.2020

  • Writer: Cenex Legal
    Cenex Legal
  • Apr 29, 2020
  • 1 min read

CX - Mere Labelling or relabelling of imported DVDs would not make them classifiable under a different heading and activity as amounting to manufacture; CENVAT could not have been availed: CESTAT CX - Mere Non-registration with department cannot be ground to allege suppression so as to invoke extended period of limitation: CESTAT ST - Refund is allowed in respect of those services which although not specifically approved, are nonetheless used for authorised operations by an SEZ unit, in view of Sections 26 & 51 of SEZ Act: CESTAT Cus - Assessment u/s 17 cannot be said to be finalized when assessee has marked protest at time of paying duty : CESTAT

Recent Posts

See All
CENEX UPDATE – 07.11.2020

CX - Property in the goods passed from the appellant to his buyer only at the port where they have obtained Let Export Order - services...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 06.11.2020

CX - Opinion of the Ministry of Finance rendered through Audit Reports is not conclusive & is also not a statement of law - hence it is...

 
 
 
CENEX UPDATE – 05.11.2020

CX - It is fit case for remand where Revenue contravenes principles of natural justice by not considering documents furnished by assessee...

 
 
 

Comments


Design & Maintained by Cenex Legal

bottom of page