CENEX UPDATE - 29.05.2020

CX - Clandestine manufacture of goods cannot be alleged on the basis that the Appellant has procured unaccounted packing material and in turn used same for manufacture of goods removed clandestinely: CESTAT 

ST - Date of despatch of o-in-o as per outward register is 15.11.2014 but the date of receipt as per postal authorities is shown as 13.11.2014 - revenue contends order served on 11.11.2014 - confusion reigns, hence no choice but to go by appellants version: CESTAT

Cus - CHA cannot be held liable for misuse of EPCG license unless any concrete evidence establishes mala fide intent of CHA to abuse such license: CESTAT